MC Grammar Presents “U Shan’t Correct This”

It’s been too long since I wrote to you.  I apologize. Lots of the normal and delicious detritus of everyday life, combined with the singularly separate and complementary weight of “original thought,” has delayed me from my typical task of writing to you. I write now, somewhat quixotically, to solve a variety of problems at … Read more

Inside Baseball: Making Models of Minds, Making Models “Behave”

Most of my research starts with the presumption that individuals are rational.  By this, I mean that they know the rules of the game, and they also know that the other players are rational.[1]  Simple empirical observation indicates the inherent contestability of this presumption.  So, why do I continue to adopt it? Well, I have … Read more

You’re Better Than This

I am nonpartisan.  I am pro-public service.  Stories like this are both disingenuous and unethical. The idea of a public social policy is that those who qualify, ahem, qualify. There is no “well, do you support this policy?” addendum.  Prohibition of such eligibility tests, however and by whomever conducted, is the basis of a liberal democracy qua equal protection. … Read more

Let Me Confirm Your Belief That Your Irrationality Is Rational

This opinion piece in the New York Times, entitled “Why We Make Bad Decisions,” by Noreena Hertz, explores the implications of a well-established psychological/behavioral phenomenon known as confirmation bias.  In a nutshell, confirmation bias describes the general tendency to overweigh information in line with one’s prior beliefs and/or give too little weight to information contradicting those … Read more

No, Seriously, That Was Such A Bad Idea, WE MUST DO IT AGAIN

Another quote in this (still) excellent piece in the New York Times by Jeremy W. Peters, describing the resolution to the debt ceiling and funding showdown, stuck out at me: The question so crucial to the Republican Party’s viability now, heading into the 2014 Congressional elections and beyond, is whether it has been so stung by the fallout that … Read more

Dis-Spence-ing with the Debt Debacle

There is an excellent piece in the New York Times by Jeremy W. Peters describing the outcome of last night’s (temporary) resolution to the debt ceiling and funding showdown. A quote stuck out at me: Others could not explain why it took so much damage, to their party and the millions of people inconvenienced and worse by … Read more

Boehner in a Manger? The Entitativity Scene in DC

The SHUTDOWN-CEILING SHOWDOWN has been depicted, typically, as “the Republicans versus [Democrats/Obama].”  The simple story here is that many people think of “the Republicans” as a unified whole, a group qua “unitary actor,” a collection of individuals who are acting as one.[1]  My recent posts (e.g. this, this, and this) and my recent blustering on the wireless have … Read more

My Bad: Dispelling The Implied Suspension of Discharge

The Daily Kos has a piece authored by “War on Error” that linked to my piece today on H.Res. 368. I want to correct a misinterpretation in that piece.  The author states that Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat, tried to end the Government Shutdown with a Discharge Petition on October 12, 2013 This isn’t correct.  Van Hollen … Read more

LegerdeBoehner, or “The Rules Rule.”

  In a little noticed procedural move on October 1st, the House of Representatives “entered in to the stage of disagreement” with the Senate with respect to H.J.Res. 59, the “clean” continuing resolution (CR) that, as currently amended by the Senate, would reopen the government at the sequestered levels.[1] Specifically, H.Res. 368 does two things.  The … Read more

Boehner in the Middle?

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney just argued that, if the House Republicans won’t allow a default, why would they not give a longer extension of the debt ceiling, instead postponing another round of brinksmanship in 6 weeks, which—the argument goes—will merely lead to another extension, with arguably deleterious impact on the economy and financial … Read more